When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On April 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on April 13, 2016, at “C main points” located in B of the East Sea and called “C main points”; and (b) on the part of the police officers who received 112 reports due to the drinking value test cost; and (c) on the part of the owners and employees of the said main points, the Defendant was aware of the circumstances of the instant case; (d) on the part of the police officers, who are police officers belonging to D district groups belonging to D district groups of the East Sea Police Station

Dol Dol Dol Doz.

In a large sense, “the victim was openly insultingd.”

2. On April 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) the victim and police officers were aboard the patrol vehicle on the front of the above main station; (b) the victim and police officers were able to board the patrol vehicle; and (c) the victim’s “Nei-si Man Man Man Man Man Man Ma

Chewing sar, multi-dar gum sark

얘 들 술집 똘만이들이야! 이 씹할!" 이라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines (not including the past record of crimes exceeding fines, and the reflection of crimes);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;