When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates a company selling construction materials with the trade name of “C” in Gyeonggi-si B.

No person shall employ any person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

1. Nevertheless, even if the Defendant committed a crime around December 10, 2017, the Defendant employed D of Russia nationality that did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment from around December 10, 2017 to around March 7, 2018 on condition that he/she would give KRW 100,000 per day or KRW 2 million per month.

2. Around March 1, 2018, the Defendant employed the Defendant on the condition that he/she would provide approximately KRW 100,000 per day to the Defendant, who was not eligible to engage in job-seeking activities for approximately seven days from March 1, 2018 to March 7, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of the registered alien record list, short-term alien information, current status of entry or departure statutes;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;