A. The gist of the parties' assertion is that the defendant claimed for the payment of KRW 35 million due to the failure of the defendant among KRW 200,000,000,000,000, which was supplied to the defendant around December 2018, and damages for delay thereof. The defendant is arguing to the purport that the person who supplied the uniforms is not only C, but also C, and thus, the plaintiff cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim.

B. Specific determination 1) In light of the following facts and circumstances that have no dispute between the parties, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), and the testimony and the whole arguments of the witness C, the defendant issued a statement that "the plaintiff supplied the defendant with the whole price of KRW 50,000,000 to KRW 60,000,000,000 to KRW 2,000,000 to the defendant on February 28, 2019."

(B) On December 19, 2018, the Defendant claimed that C, the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her.

(C) On October 29, 2019, the Plaintiff’s father and the Defendant confirmed the outstanding amount of KRW 35 million and paid in cash by the method designated by the seller until December 30, 2019.