The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below is just in finding guilty of each of the facts charged in this case and each of the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act (excluding the acquittal portion). Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence

Other grounds of appeal by the defendant do not constitute legitimate grounds of appeal under Article 383 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Meanwhile, the Defendant appealed to the remaining guilty portion of the judgment below, but there is no indication of the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal and no statement of the grounds for appeal is found in the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.