All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The Defendant (unfair sentencing)’s punishment (an amount of KRW 3 million) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s (unfair sentencing)’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant had been punished several times for the same crime, and that the Defendant was unable to enter the stuff at the entrance of Pakistan, and that the nature of the crime is bad in light of the method or method of the crime.

B. However, when the defendant was in a trial, confession and reflects the crime of this case, and the crime of this case is highly likely to obstruct the victim's pension business.

In full view of the fact that the most same criminal record is not visible, and that there was no record of criminal punishment for the defendant from that time, and that there was no record of criminal punishment for the defendant from that time, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the age, background of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is not deemed to be too minor or unreasonable.

(c)

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since all appeals filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit, they are all dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.