When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 9, 2017, the Defendant, around 13:50 on June 13, 2017, placed in the Jung-gu Seoul Central District of C in order to sell it by the victim D(33). The Defendant, at around 20,000 won, placed one sofabbing bank equivalent to 60,000 won owned by the victim and one another.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the date of the third public trial shall be the date);

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the fact that the defendant, for reasons of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, has acknowledged his fault late; (b) the defendant immediately returned the damaged goods to the victim due to the arrest of the defendant in the act of committing an offense; and (c) the defendant’s economic environment is not good; (d) however, considering the various circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's serious anti-influence exists; and (c) the punishment of a fine prescribed in the instant

It does not appear.