사문서위조등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one and half years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 26, 2011, the Defendant: (a) received a written estimate file from Company F, Inc. (hereinafter “F”), a subcontractor, from Company E office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, about KRW 11,00,000 of the construction amount, via e-mail, the Defendant changed the estimate amount to KRW 16,956,00,000 using a computer, and printed it out.
Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged one copy of a quotation in the name of F, which is a private document related to the certification of facts, and forged 30 copies of a quotation in the name of F, which is a private document related to the certification of facts, from around that time to January 4, 2013, by the aforesaid method 30 times in total.
2. Around January 17, 2012, the Defendant used a forged estimate to I, who is aware of the fact that it was not possible to implement the foregoing Article by attaching a forged estimate, which was written in Paragraph 1, at the place indicated in Paragraph 1, to obtain approval from E representative director I, a company E representative director I, and attaching it to E representative director I as indicated in Paragraph 1.
From around that time to February 8, 2013, the Defendant used 30 copies of a written estimate in the name of F, such as the attached list of crimes (1).
3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, presented the settlement of F’s outsourcing to I, the representative director of the victim E, who is the victim E, along with a written estimate in the name of F, as described in paragraph 1.
However, as described in Paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) issued a written estimate amount received from F operator G; (b) obtained approval from F operator G; (c) made the victim’s company pay F with F in accordance with the content of approval; and (d) intended to receive a refund of the difference between the actual estimate amount and the actual estimate amount; and (c) the actual estimate amount was smaller than the amount of the written estimate that the Defendant completed.
The Defendant is in such a manner as above.