2. The Defendant’s confession of the instant crime and reflects the Defendant, and the fact that the amount of damage in the instant case is relatively small is a favorable sentencing ground.

However, up to the time of the trial, the defendant seems not to have agreed with the victim of this case, and it is difficult to find the materials that have discharged the damage, and the defendant has the history of having received criminal punishment several times by being sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000 as a crime of fraud around 205. In full view of all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, occupation, circumstance and contents leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.