2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. The Plaintiff’s grounds for appeal do not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance trial. In full view of the evidence submitted in the first instance trial along with the content of the allegation, it is recognized that the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court, which divided the real estate of this case into three equal parts and then divided the two parts into one thousand square meters in order of each of the items in the attached Form No. 15, 14, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10, 11, and 15 into the Plaintiff’s ownership, and the portion in the attached Form No. 1,2, 3, 13, 13, 4, 14, 15, 12, and 1 of the attached Table No. 1, 2,204 square meters into two different parts, are justifiable.

B. Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) “the instant case” under the second 14 and 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed as “the first instance and the appellate court; (b) “the branch office strengthening the Korea Land Information Corporation” under the third 17 of the judgment is deemed as “the head of the first instance court’s branch office strengthening the Korea Land Information Corporation”; and (c) “the value of the fourth 15” under the fourth 15 of the judgment is deemed as “reduction,” and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus,

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, so the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.