2. Although the judgment of the court below acknowledged the defendant's mistake and reflects that the defendant did not have the same criminal records, it is acknowledged that the defendant did not recover from damage although the defendant had a considerable mental impulse due to the crime of this case, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that can be considered newly after the decision of the court below, and other various sentencing conditions in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, etc., are too unreasonable, and therefore the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.