As above, the Defendant spited the victim’s face once after the victim spits the victim’s seat, against the victim’s assault.

2. Determination

A. In contrast, there are statements between the victim and F in this court and the police as evidence that correspond to the facts charged against the defendant, and eventually, the question is how reliable the victim and F statements are made.

However, the memory of the facts experienced by a person becomes more clear than the first time after the lapse of the time, and the person who stated that he was first aware should give sufficient explanation about the reversal of his statement. However, as seen below, the above two persons' statements are more concrete with the lapse of time and may be partially reversed, but there is no explanation about the reasons.

1 A statement of C on August 27, 2013: The police interrogation protocol of a suspect of a suspect of a suspect of a suspect of a suspect of a suspect of a police on the back of the vehicle: The defendant spits the brine into the Defendant's body while spiting the brine on the face of “this spite is equal to the brine franch franch” while spiting the brine into the Defendant's body while bringing the brine to the lower end of the vehicle.

② The accusation on August 28, 2013: The complaint spits twice on the face of the Defendant, while the Defendant was spited, and the Defendant was spited at the low face.