However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant, as a local reserve force belonging to the 2nd unit in Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, the Defendant did not receive training without justifiable grounds, even after receiving a notice of a muster for training in the name of the 2506 unit commander of the 4th unit of the 2506 unit of the Army, to the effect that “from March 2, 2016 to March 4, 2016, the Defendant is attending the 2506 unit of the Army, which was conducted by the 2506 unit of the 2506 unit of the 2506 unit of the 2506 unit of the Army.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of convening authority;

1. A local reserve force organization card;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing receipt of call notice;

1. Article 15(9)1 and Article 6(1)1 of the Act on the Establishment of Local Reserve Forces (amended by Act No. 14184, May 29, 2016) relating to the relevant criminal facts and the former Establishment of Local Reserve Forces for the Selection of Punishment (amended by Act No. 14184, May 29, 2016)

1. The sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the sentencing under subparagraph 1) is due to the suspension of execution - the punishment under subparagraph 1 of the same Article - the fact that the previous offense of this case was committed even though the previous offense of a fine of the same kind was three times more favorable: The fact that the error