When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 8, 2015, the Defendant, “2016 High 369,” prepared a loan-related document of KRW 5 million by submitting a loan-related document to the KON-based loan loan loan center, a damaged person, at an influent place, and performed the loan-related work. From October 8, 2015 to October 31, 2020, the Defendant drafted a 4,780 won per day and the monthly interest of KRW 143,424 on October 8, 201, and faithfully performed the loan-related contract without an individual rehabilitation and a petition for bankruptcy.

However, there was no intention or ability to perform the above contract normally or to repay the interest and principal of the loan.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a loan of five million won from the injured party, and requested the victim to send data on the personal rehabilitation claim to the victim at least eight days, and applied for the personal rehabilitation on October 30, 2015 to take advantage of the same amount.

On October 8, 2015, the Defendant submitted a loan-related document to the KCAB loan loan-related center in a non-fluent place, and implemented a loan of five million won. From October 8, 2015 to October 31, 2020, the Defendant drafted a 4,750 won per day from October 8, 2015 to October 31, 2020, which is free to pay KRW 142,50,00 per month interest, and faithfully performed the loan-related document without an individual rehabilitation and a bankruptcy petition.

However, even if the loan is granted, there was no intention or ability to normally perform the above contract or to repay the interest and principal of the loan.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a loan of five million won from the victim.

[2016 High 742] The Defendant, on September 14, 2015, posted a phone to the victim C at Asan-si, Asan-si, Asan-si, with the property of KRW 45 million.

A loan of 9 million won shall be used and repaid only for three months.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false representation.”

However, Dtel is the defendant only in the name of the lessee under the lease agreement.