beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.09.22 2016고단3418

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 30, 2016, the Defendant driven a vehicle with alcohol level of approximately 0.09% in the section of about 10km from the 10km to the front road of a gas station, as in the 92-1 of the Jindo-Eup, Jindo-si, Geumcheon-si, Geumcheon-gu, Gyeongcheon-gu, Gyeongcheon-gu, Gyeongcheon-do. On May 30, 201, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of at least 0.09% in alcohol level in the direction of a gas station.

2. A person who is engaged in the duty of driving a motor vehicle with soflurt from B, in violation of the applicable rate in the aggravated punishment, etc. of a specific crime (or in the case of an accident) and in violation of the Road Traffic Act (or after an accident).

On May 30, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car on the front of the Daegu large-distance University located in the Jinsan-si university located in the Jin-si in the Jin-si in the Gyeonggi-do, Chungcheongnam-do on May 30, 2016, and proceeded at a speed of about 20 to 30km each hour among the roads on the lower side of the Daegu large-distance road in the Hanyang-do.

Since there is another motor vehicle standing in the signal atmosphere at the front intersection, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and accurately manipulate the brake and steering gear to proceed in a safe speed and manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not avoid the DaCA110 Orala of the injured party C (61) drive, which was under the influence of the influence of the influence of the influence of the influence of the influence of the influence of the influence of the influence of the traffic and was under the influence of the traffic signal at the same intersection as above 1, and the Defendant did not avoid the lower part of the injured party E-driving, which had been under the influence of the influence of the influence of the traffic, and continued to shock the part of the front part of the car driven by the Defendant. The above damage caused the e-driving of the injured party, which was under the influence of the traffic signal from the front bank, and did not avoid the e-driving of the injured party E-driving, which was under the influence of the traffic signal from the front bank, and was under the influence of the traffic signal from the above e-driving.

After all, the defendant is bound to set aside the left-hand framework that requires approximately seven weeks of treatment to the victim C due to the above occupational negligence.