However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On October 12, 201, the Defendant attempted to larceny: (a) around 10:20 on October 12, 201, when entering the victim C’s house located in Seocho-si B and not corrected by any cre in his house; (b) the Defendant did not commit any attempted theft by entering the victim’s house room through a cresh door, which is not corrected by any creshion.

2. The Defendant, who entered a residence, entered the victim’s house at the same time and at the same place as the above paragraph (1) and intrudes on the victim’s house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police statement law to C and D

1. Relevant Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no damage to property after attempted crimes, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;