2. The Defendant and his defense counsel did not have the victim’s her her her son, as indicated in the facts charged. Even if the Defendant’s her son contacted the victim’s her her her son, this does not necessarily lead to the Defendant’s her son who had a credit card with a view to calculating the victim’s her son while her her her her son was her her son, etc. and her her son was her knick, and the Defendant’s her her son was her knick with a view to committing an indecent act.

3. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

① On the day of the instant case, the Defendant and one-way F were seated at the first seat at the entrance of the instant head office, and the Defendant’s one-way ordered three-way diseases to the victim in charge of ice ice, and the victim brought three-way diseases to the Defendant table. G, who was in charge of the one-way watch, said G, “I am to do so? I am you do not need to do so,” and said G, who was in charge of the one-way duty, said G, to the effect that “I see how I would do so. I am on the side and drink you will do so.”

② The Defendant and the victim, as well as the Defendant and the victim, were sitting in the instant heading, facing the Defendant and the Defendant, G was located in the kitchen, and one team was added to the table at the place where the Defendant’s table entered to the inside.

③ 피고인은 냉장고 앞에서 술병을 정리하던 피해자를 불러 ‘팝콘이나 한 번 줘봐라’는 취지로 말하였고 이에 피해자가 피고인에게 팝콘이 남아...