2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or may be acknowledged by adding up the whole purport of the pleadings to the entries in Gap evidence 1-1 through 5, evidence 1-2-1 through 60, evidence 4-13, 17, evidence 1-1, 2, and evidence 2.

The plaintiffs and the designated parties are several buyers who were sold in lots or succeeded to the status of the sales contract from the first buyer of the company, the Busan Urban Community Federation (hereinafter referred to as the "Federation of Busan Urban Community") that was the first developer among the commercial buildings of G main apartment constructed on the land of the Busan Urban Community Co., Ltd. F and 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "instant commercial building"), from among the commercial buildings of G main apartment building constructed on the land of the Busan Urban Community Co., Ltd., Busan Urban Community Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Seoul Urban Community Co., Ltd.")., and the defendant Gaco Association Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Co., Ltd.") was the co-implementer of the above main apartment construction project, and the defendant Yang apartment reconstruction Association and Sam Chang Apartment apartment reconstruction Association (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Co., Ltd.") together with the defendant Co., Ltd.

In around 194, the Busan-gu Busan-gu Busan-do Federation made 13 square meters of commercial buildings to be newly constructed on the ground, such as Busan-gu F, and sold 35,100,000 won of sales price, and received the sales price from buyers around that time. During the delay in the construction of the said new commercial building, the said new commercial building construction was agreed to supply 18 square meters per 18 square meters per commercial building buyer after succeeding the said new commercial building construction project from the Busan-gu Federation of Industrial Products (hereinafter referred to as the "leap development, etc."), and the said new commercial building construction project was integrated into each apartment reconstruction project by the defendant association of neighboring land and expanded into the housing construction project (hereinafter referred to as the "housing construction project of this case").

The site, business rights, and ground buildings, etc. of the housing construction project of this case on May 13, 2003.