A. The Defendant, at the time of the instant case, was dissatisfied with H’s daily activity, but the Defendant’s grandchildren were only her son in the process of spreading her flock with the victim’s her flock. As such, the Defendant did not have the intention of indecent act by compulsion.

Therefore, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, which found the Defendant guilty of the charge of indecent act by compulsion on the part of the facts charged against the Defendant.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, the victim made a statement consistent with the facts charged in this case to the effect that "the defendant showed the defendant as if he was her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her. her her her her.