However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, as the representative of the D Research Council in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C and 118 Dong 404, is a person who performs a work to connect a “after school” instructor with a school.

1. Around January 2015, the Defendant forged a public document by using a file of the certificate of the excellent instructor in the name of the principal of the school in the name of the school in the name of the principal of the school in the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle, and the name and resident registration number of another “after-school” recorded in the certificate of certification and the document of the certification of the career of the principal in the middle of the school.

2. From March 2013 to March 2015, the Defendant used a forged public document seven times in total, as indicated in [Attachment Table (2] from March 2013 to March 2015, 2015, at an elementary school located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 1185, on behalf of E, the Defendant submitted a false public document, such as a false public document, a certified public instructor in the name of the principal of the public school, and a career certificate, on behalf of E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police against the defendant's legal statement E, F, G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report investigation into the police statement protocol with respect to L (referring to submission of suspect A data), investigation report (referring to cases of instructors other than a case for instructors);

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of the same Article as the official document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of forged official document) concerning criminal facts.