However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 28, 2017, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) was in storage of the container of “E” stores operated by the victim C in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, for the victim’s stores; (b) used the gap in which the victim completed his/her business and left his/her supervision by neglecting surveillance; (c) put in the cresh of the entrance of the place in advance and damaged the milch door; and (d) 1.50 adult goods in total amounting to KRW 7 million at the market price of the victim’s possession, which was opened into the said place, were stolen.

2. On October 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 04:30 on October 3, 2017, the victim F was clothes “H” operated by the victim F in G in Kimhae-si; (b) the victim completed his/her business and left his/her office and her supervision was neglected; (c) the victim drawed in the cre of the entrance and then destroyed and damaged the suck in advance; (d) the victim drawed the suck in the cre of the entrance; and (c) the victim was sucked with the object to be stolen, but failed to discover stolen objects, such as cash.

3. On October 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed a special larceny against the victim I by the victim I at Kimhae-si around 04:45, 2017; (b) came in the “K” coffee shop operated by the victim I; (c) the victim completed his/her business and left his/her business and neglected surveillance; and (d) damaged the crepit of the entrance of the following gate by putting him/her in front and then destroying the suck, then trying to color the object to be stolen by entering the said place; (d) however, the entrance was installed twice, and thus, failed to intrude into the building.

4. On October 3, 2017, at around 05:00 on October 3, 2017, the Defendant was in a 'N’ restaurant operated by the victim L L in Kimhae-si, and the victim left the restaurant and left the room for surveillance by taking advantage of the gap in which the victim was negligent in surveillance, the Defendant removed and damaged the window of the window of the window following the restaurant by using a dynasium in which the victim had in advance the window of the window of the window of the restaurant, and entered the place.