beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.08.13 2019고단2545

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for ten months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person who actually operates a game room in the trade name of Daegu Dong-gu C2, and “D,” and Defendant A conspiredd to engage in money exchange business in the above game room by setting up a lease contract with respect to the above game room in his own name while working in the above game room as an employee, and deciding to play a job in the event that the game room is controlled.

No one shall exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products as a business.

그럼에도 불구하고, 피고인들은 2018. 10. 7.경부터 2018. 10. 29.경까지 위 ‘D’ 게임장에서, ‘더블샷’ 게임기 40대를 설치하여 운영하면서 불특정 다수의 손님들에게 위 게임물의 이용을 통하여 획득한 점수 1점 당 1원으로 계산하여 수수료 명목으로 10%를 공제한 나머지 금액을 손님들에게 현금으로 환전하여 주었다.

As a result, Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police officer made to the police officer again (00);

1. Report on internal investigation (Attachment to a management ledger of the 112 US Regulation, and attachment of money exchange videos);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Defendants: Relevant legal provisions of facts constituting a crime and the choice of punishment: Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A of a community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation Defendant B: The reason for sentencing of Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act - the time of and reflects on the commission of a crime, and Defendant A has no record of punishment - Defendant B had been punished for a year of imprisonment with labor for the same kind of crime on January 2013, and again committed a second offense during a considerable period of time.