If the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 50,000 won.

Defendant

A is the president of the branch of the Cno-D area, and the defendant B is the members of Cno-D area.

1. On November 23, 2012, around 15:45, the Defendants completed a briefing session with the Ministry of Employment and Labor related to “the industrial accident of foreign workers, death of foreign workers, and Frush accident” at the Mapo-si Office of the Gwangju Regional Employment and Labor, and the Ministry of Labor, and Defendant A, in advance, laid down two red lit-in boxes, which the Defendants prepared in advance, into the front floor of the above office building, and laid down on the front floor and the pole of the red straw frame so as to read “the detention of the business owner, the dissolution of the Ministry of Labor,” and Defendant B damaged their respective public offices by means of a red chroding frame to read “the removal, removal, and dissolution of the Ministry of Labor” on a report with disabled persons.

2. On November 23, 2012, Defendant A purchased two red paints and red blue presses at the top-dong and upper-dong, and carried them by dividing them into two plastic bags prepared in advance. On the same date and time as paragraph 1, and at the same place as paragraph 1, Defendant infringed upon the above Ministry of Employment and Labor’s office building for the purpose of committing the crime as referred to in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

Application of each of the Defendants’ respective legal statements, each police protocol against G/H/I, CCTV photographs, and documentary evidence photographs statutes

1. Relevant criminal facts: Selection of a fine for negligence;

(a) Damage to goods for public use by Defendant A: Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act; Intrusion into a structure: Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act;

B. Damage to Defendant B’s goods for public use: Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act

2. Aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

4. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Each of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was committed before and once a fine equivalent to the same kind of fine respectively, but the motive for the instant crime shall be considered.