Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On January 15, 2018, from around 16:30 to 16:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant’s apartment management by leaving the victim D (61) who is the manager of the management office of the Seoul Jung-gu apartment complex, Seoul Central District Office, that did not reflect his claim in the notice of retenders related to the selection of the Nitice Center controlled by the management office, on the ground that he did not reflect his claim that he was “illegal”; (b) threatening the Defendant’s dismissal of the Defendant; and (c) interfered with the Defendant’s apartment management by taking advantage of his failure, such as making the mat installed on the matry of the maty and separating the mather cover from the matry.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Statement made with D;

1. The E witness statement;

1. Investigation report (related to the accounting of the management office and the currency);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a written public notice of the proposed person's preparation (the 61th page of investigation records);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;