Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On April 17, 2014, at around 02:25, the Defendant made a dispute with D and fare-related issues, a taxi engineer of the taxi in front of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and caused the Plaintiff to have a defect once again in front of the driver’s seat of the said vehicle, and continuously made the victim feel “as much as he would receive,” the Defendant expressed that he would be “the flapia, later in the Gu office,” which is the taxi engineer E and police officer F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A complaint filed in D;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Articles 311 and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;