2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. From May 23, 2016, the Plaintiff served as a public official of Grade B and Grade VII of the administrative affairs of the ASEAN (general term system).

B. On December 21, 2016, the Cheongnam-do Personnel Committee: (a) took a bath against the Plaintiff on July 27, 2016, which the Plaintiff demanded for taxi expenses in front of the Plaintiff’s residence; (b) inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff’s neck on his neck (hereinafter “instant Disciplinary Reason No. 1”); (c) from October 7, 2016 to October 01:38, 2016, the Plaintiff provided the Plaintiff with a view to the removal of the Plaintiff from the victim’s face (hereinafter “the instant Disciplinary Reason No. 1”) on the ground that the victim was not able to do so; and (d) caused the instant disciplinary cause to be interfered with the Plaintiff’s removal of the victim’s face by taking advantage of violence and cruel on the floor on which the Plaintiff displayed in the decoration and drinking 20, thereby obstructing the Defendant’s operation of the instant disciplinary cause (hereinafter “the instant disciplinary cause”).

C. Accordingly, on January 5, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the dismissal disposition pursuant to Article 69(1)3 of the Local Public Officials Act.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an appeal review with the appeals review committee, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, but was dismissed on March 6, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 6 evidence, Eul evidence 1 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion is as follows: (1) (the grounds of disciplinary action of this case).