beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고단3487

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 3487"

1. From July 18, 2016 to October 10, 2016, the Defendant is a person who operates the static point of “E” on the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu D and the first floor.

On July 2016, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would pay the price by the end of the week when he/she supplied the neck, such as the scambling, scambling, and scambling, to G, who is an employee of the victim F.”

However, the Defendant had no initial capital, and had no intent or ability to pay the price even if the Defendant received the meat from the injured party, such as overdue management expenses and the age of electricity, due to the lack of initial capital.

As such, the Defendant, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Table from July 18, 2016 to October 10, 2016, by deceiving the victims, received goods equivalent to KRW 63,906,693 from the victims of the damage, as well as from July 30, 2016, by deceiving the victims to receive goods equivalent to KRW 35,937,024 from the victims of the damage.

"2017 Highest 5758"

2. On July 15, 2016, the Defendant is a person who operates the static point of “E” on the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government D and the first floor.

On July 7, 2016, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would pay the price to the Defendant up to July 31, 2016, by delivering the strawer to open a refined restaurant to the Defendant through H, a staff member of the static point, at the vicinity of the above refined landing point office.”

However, the Defendant had no initial capital, and had no intent or ability to pay the price even if the Defendant received the meat from the injured party, such as overdue management expenses and the age of electricity, due to the lack of initial capital.

On July 15, 2016, the Defendant was supplied with a variety of meat equivalent to KRW 14,680,80,800 from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

Each fact of the Decision 1 [2017 Highest 3487]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The defendant;