beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.09.17 2015고단3977

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment was finalized on April 20, 2011.

From September 26, 2012 to October 18, 2012, the Defendant, along with B, operated a game room under the trade name of “D” located in Jung-gu, Incheon, Jung-gu, and the second floor between September 26, 2012 and October 10, 2012. E is a person who worked as an employee of the above game room and received KRW 100,000 per day while working as an employee of the above game room, and performed the duties of managing the game room, such as purchase, installation, maintenance,

No one shall provide game products for the distribution or use, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Products Management Committee, or display or store them for such purposes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, along with B and E, installed 40 game machine "Sea Sarch3" at the above date, time, and place, provided the game machine to many unspecified customers who found the game machine.

The settlement mail of the above game machine, which was rated by the Game Management Committee, was confirmed by the method of opening a manager's establishment by using a chain inside the device. In addition, it was possible to install a separate settlement window or verify it by any other means. However, unlike the contents of the rating, the game machine provided by the defendant, etc. was modified so that the game machine manager can install a separate settlement window to confirm the number of the items card and operate the game room, which is discharged at the bottom of the manager's creation on the game screen by using a separate external device in the above game product.

Accordingly, in collusion with B and E, the Defendant provided the game machine with contents different from the above-grade contents for customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning B and E;

1. Investigation Report A, E.