A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months, and a fine of 10,000,000 won for Defendant B.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Defendant A [criminal records] Defendant A] on December 8, 2015, who was sentenced to one year to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (compacting) in the support of Suwon Friwon Friwon, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 17, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. He established an old-age corporation’s establishment and transfer of an access medium connected to the account in the name of the corporation, and the F planned to open several accounts in the name of the corporation and receive passbooks, cash cards, etc., and then transfer them to the Internet gambling site operator, etc. E decided to take charge of the role of transferring the name of the old-age corporation, passbooks, cash cards, etc. to the Internet gambling site operator, etc., F is responsible for the role of managing the lending of name, F is the role of issuing corporation establishment, business registration, passbooks, cash cards, etc. by lending the name of the Defendant.

A. On September 2016, the Defendant conspired with E and F in order to deliver documents necessary for the establishment of a corporation, such as the transcript of the Defendant’s resident registration number, to the H office’s H office name in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on September 23, 2016. On September 23, 2016, the said employee used Defendant’s personal information in the country of registration of the Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, for the location of the principal office, “Seoul Gangnam-gu I building, 3rd floor 464” as “50,000,000 won” in total capital, and had a public official under whose name was not registered for the establishment, etc. of the said J corporation and keep the registration in the register of the corporation.

However, the Defendant established the company as above and did not intend to operate the company, and there was no intention to establish the corporate office.

As such, the Defendant is E and F.