When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On March 03, 2017, Defendant A made a false statement that “I wish to lend money to the victim D” at the C Manpower Introduction Office located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju Northern-gu, stating that “I wish to do so on the following day.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant identified the victim from the victim on the same day, and received 90,000 won from the post office account (F) in the name of the defendant to the new account (G) in the name of the defendant, and received 90,000 won in cash directly and acquired 1.8 million won in cash.

2. On March 07, 2017, the Defendant, at the same place as the above A, made a false statement stating that “The Defendant will repay money to the victim on the following day on the face of lending money.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant acquired 1.8 million won from the victim's father's account in Gwangju Bank account (I) in the name of the victim on the same day from the victim's father and acquired 1.8 million won from the new bank account in the name of the defendant.

3. On March 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at K’s L’s L’s L’s office, other than the instant case in the Gwangju Mine District, there is no money to receive L’s friendship; (b) L’s card was collected from the victim, and there is no money to be kept from a tax base of, and abandoned over, the CD.

The phrase “a million won loan” was false.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received from the injured party one million won in cash at the same place as above on the same day and acquired it by fraud.

4. The Defendant’s foregoing, on October 29, 2017.

In the same place as this section, the victim was not yet able to receive the money from the victim.

The phrase “a loan exceeding one million won” was false.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant is suffering from damage.