beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2009.07.15 2009고단20

향토예비군설치법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is a homeland reserve force member.

1. The Defendant, at around 22:00 on April 7, 2007, received a notice of call-up for training in the name of the above commander that he would undergo the sixth supplementary training in the name of the above commander, which was conducted from April 23, 2007 to April 25, 2007 from April 2007 by the 1st unit of the Army, which was conducted from April 23, 2007 to April 25, 2007.

2. The Defendant, at around 22:00 on June 16, 2007, received a notice of a call-up for training in the name of the above commander that he would receive seven supplementary training (6 hours) during the overall period of 2006 homeland defense operations plans conducted by the first unit unit of the 7508 Army on July 2, 2007 at the same place as Paragraph (1) and paragraph (1) at the same time, but did not undergo the said training without justifiable grounds.

3. The Defendant, at around 22:00 on June 16, 2007, received a notice of a call-up for training in the name of the above commander that he would receive the fourth supplementary training (6 hours) of the homeland defense operations plan in the late 2006, which was conducted in the first unit of 7508 Army at the same place as that of paragraph (1) and paragraph (1), and did not undergo the said training without justifiable grounds.

4. The Defendant, at around 22:20 on July 1, 2007, received a notice of a call-up for training in the name of the above commander, which would result in the second supplementary training (6 hours) of the homeland defense operation plan for the first half of July 18, 2007, which was conducted by the first unit of the 7508 Army on July 18, 2007 at the same place as Paragraph (1) was not subject to the said training without justifiable grounds.

5. The Defendant received, at around 19:00 on October 15, 2007, a notice of call-up in the name of the above commander that he would receive the second supplementary training (6 hours) in the latter half of 2007, which was conducted at the first unit of 7508 Army on November 2, 2007 at the same place as Paragraph (1) and paragraph (1), and did not receive the said training without justifiable grounds.

6. The defendant, at around 22:00 on November 3, 2007, received supplementary training (third and twenty-four hours) at the same place as Paragraph (1) and at the same time from November 19, 2007 to November 21, 2007 under the name of the above large-scale commander, which was conducted at the 7508 unit unit of the Army from November 19, 2007.