Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

On February 25, 2015, the Defendant, around February 25, 2015, ordered the Victim C to prepare a certificate of borrowing KRW 21 million that the Defendant borrowed from the injured party. On April 2015, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 5 million out of the above borrowed money to the injured party and to draw up a certificate of borrowing KRW 16 million.

At around 13:00 on June 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) demanded the injured party to set up a certificate of borrowing KRW 21 million on a “E” restaurant located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) demanded the injured party to set up a certificate of borrowing KRW 16 million; and (c) destroyed the above certificate of borrowing KRW 21 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Part C of the three-time suspect examination protocol against the defendant;

1. C Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the first examination of suspect for the police;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 366 (Selection of Penalty Penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;