If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant, at around 07:20 on January 26, 2012, driven a C Ecoos car and driven the coos car from the 363rd, Seogu-gu, Seogu, Daegu to the “Yeong-gu, Yeong-do,” while driving the road from the 363rd, Seogu, Seo-gu, Seoul. Therefore, the Defendant had a duty of care to properly see the left and right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went away from the lane to drive the lane, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s failure to go on the left side of the above taxi, and received the pent part as the front side part of the car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered light salt in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment due to occupational negligence as seen above, and at the same time, the Defendant left the said taxi without immediately stopping the said taxi so that 389,250 won can move to repair costs and failed to take measures such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers of the accused;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates, estimates, photographs of damaged vehicles, and photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences and the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;