If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On May 20, 2018, the Defendant damaged property in front of the apartment building B in Ansan-si, a member-si, an Ansan-si, a member-si, a member-si, a member-si, and a member-si, a member-si, a member of the victim C's operation, took a common bath with the victim, and took a dispute with the victim, thereby impairing its utility by putting two direction tools for the vehicle in which the market price on the victim's ownership is unknown, and by inserting it into his/her hand, into the inside the vehicle.

2. The Defendant, after getting off from a taxi in the operation of the victim at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, intends to open the knife to the knife on the knife on the knife on the knife of the victim, and toward the victim, “The knife down before the fnife death of this kn

The author expressed the attitude that the victim's life and body seems to be harmful to the victim, such as taking a bath that the saves are "the save".

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. CCTV images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (booms voice analysis);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to property and the choice of fines) and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation and the selection of fines) concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, without being aware of the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that he was a repeated offender, is likely to commit each of the crimes of this case. However, the defendant appears to have committed each of the crimes of this case by contingency, the value of damaged property is a small amount, the defendant shows an attitude against the mistake of the defendant, the defendant agreed with the victim, and the victim wanted the defendant's wife, shall be determined as the sentence of this case as ordered.