except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From 03:00 on March 24, 2014 to 08:10 on the same day, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, drunkd the victim D (the 51-year old), an employee of the C cafeteria located in Seosan City B, and without any reason, met once a bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of me.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of victims;

1. Application of the statutes in the form of a suspect;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence interfere with the business of victims during long-term hours, the method of committing the crime of the defendant was also poor, the damage recovery was not made, and the crime of this case was committed even if there were previous convictions who were punished several times due to violent crimes, as well as all the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined by comprehensively