A. At around 12:30 on December 29, 2010 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) B:

) While driving the Plaintiff and driving the Defendant, while proceeding in the vicinity of the Gocheon-gu Gocheon-gu Gocheon-dong Godong, the Plaintiff’s driver who was going back on the Gyeongcheon-gu Gocheon-dong Gocheon-do, was slicked on the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) The Plaintiff suffered from the injury, such as damage to satisfy, etc. due to the instant accident.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract. The fact that there is no dispute over grounds for recognition, entry

B. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Plaintiff sustained injury due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring special circumstances, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as an insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

【Ground of recognition】 In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 3, 4, Eul evidence 5-1, 2, and Eul evidence 6-1, 2, and 3; the result of the physical appraisal and inquiry about the head of Korea University Hospital; the result of the physical appraisal and inquiry about the head of Korea University Hospital; the significant fact; the rule of experience and the purport of the whole pleadings

A. Personal information 1) Personal information: The same shall apply to the entry in the “basic matters” list of the amount of damages calculated: 2) income: The Plaintiff was working as a social welfare worker at the time of the instant accident at the Go River General Social Welfare Center and earned income.