폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;
2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;
Punishment of the crime
On July 23, 2015, at around 02:20, the Defendant: (a) stated that the time for the victim to complete his/her business while drinking alcohol together with his/her daily operation at the D cafeteria operated by Namgu-gu, Daegu-gu, (the age of 61) was the time for the victim to complete his/her business; (b) thus, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s right-hand arms one time by using a bend of the victim’s head debt with his/her hand.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Part of the witness C’s legal statement;
1. Statement of Police Statement against C (A defendant denies that he did not assault the victim due to beer's disease). However, in full view of the statements made on the day of the instant case and the statements made by investigation agency of the victim C with credibility in the time of the instant case, and the statements made by the defendant to investigation agency of the victim C with a clear memory, although it is not accurately memoryed, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed an assault to the right side of the victim due to beer's disease in light of the statements made by C in this court and the statements made by the defendant that recognized the fact that the defendant had contacted with the victim's body due to beer's disease, the fact that the
1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act, Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The main reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that it is highly dangerous that the defendant prices the victim with a beer who is a dangerous object, and that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and that there is no record of punishment in addition to the fine two times.