건물명도 등
1. Defendant (Appointed Party) and Appointed C shall pay KRW 25,000,000 to the Plaintiff, respectively.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. In the Seoul Southern District Court D auction procedure, the Defendant (the appointed party, hereinafter “Defendant”), the appointed party C (hereinafter “Defendant and the said appointed party,” collectively referred to as “Defendant, etc.”) at the auction, agreed to re-transfer the said building to E upon receipt of KRW 1.34 billion, between E and E on February 25, 2013.
B. For the normal operation of the instant building on May 13, 2013, E, the Defendant, and F drafted a memorandum of agreement containing the following:
1) E shall pay 50 million won to F for the interior work of the instant building. However, KRW 50 million shall be paid to F by the Defendant, etc., and the payment method shall be determined by the Defendant, etc., and F. However, the Defendant, etc., shall be paid simultaneously with the intention of the entire building, and the written waiver of the right of retention shall be implemented simultaneously with the preparation of a written agreement. 2) At the same time, the right of retention for the instant building should be terminated and the underground one shall be delivered to the same person.
3) A plan for the installation of facilities for the elderly and children prepared on March 19, 2012 and a contract for construction work written on March 11, 2013 are to be null and void, and a contract for construction work is to be waived. 4) A contract for the installation of facilities for the elderly and children is to be waived by the F so that G and H do not raise any objection.
7) penalties - In the event that E does not perform the construction cost of KRW 50 million as agreed upon, F shall have a legal claim. (c) The Plaintiff is subject to the Daejeon District Court Decision 2008Gadan71831 Decided June 5, 2013 (2013TTTTT 18199), according to the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Gadan71831, F was issued a seizure and collection order with respect to each claim of KRW 25 million against the Defendant, etc. in accordance with the above written consent, and the written decision was served on the Defendant on June 13, 2013, and on the Selection C on the same month. 【No dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap 1 and 2 evidence, Eul 1 evidence, and the purport of the entire pleadings, respectively, and the purport of the entire pleadings.
2. The assertion and judgment
(a)a disposal document, if any;