However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, in 2009, was able to receive money from the victim C (the age of 42 at the time of committing the crime on May 201) who was aware of the Defendant’s child at a middle school parents group at the time of the Defendant’s children attending the middle school (the age of 42 at the time of committing the crime on May 201) and from the middle school in 2011, he ended with the Defendant’s wife in the beginning of 2012. However, as the Defendant’s wife was divorced from the Defendant’s wife and was faced with economic difficulties, the Defendant was able to receive money by using the fact that the Defendant was in an inhuman relationship with the

On May 22, 2013, the Defendant called the victim by phone and called “a fluent relationship with the party’s husband at the home without giving money,” and called “a fluent relationship with the party’s husband at the high school where the new child attends, and she would throw away the fact that the new child was pregnant before her old age.”

On May 22, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 500,000 from the Defendant’s living woman D to the agricultural bank account in the name of the Defendant’s living woman, and received KRW 500,000 from March 28, 2015, totaling KRW 21 times from that time, as indicated in the attached crime list from March 28, 2015.

2. The Defendant, as seen above, had the victim attacked with money, demanded that money be frightened to the victim at the end of March 2015, and had the victim demanded, but the victim did not comply with the promise to pay money without having to get a telephone, with the victim’s call at the “F” main point in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, to receive money by threatening the victim with contact and knife.

On April 1, 2015, the Defendant provided the victim with the above “F” at the main point of the “F, and then prepared a knife (18 centimeters in the blade length) in the Sungnam-gu G and the Defendant’s house, which had been in the kitchen at the Sungnam-gu G and 401, and was waiting for the victim to leave the said place of promise, and called out upon receiving a report from the victim.