beta
(영문) 청주지방법원충주지원 2016.04.28 2015가단22185

공사대금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 157,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from August 1, 2015 to April 28, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 16, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for a construction period of the freezing warehouse-related construction work (hereinafter “instant construction work”) from January 14, 2015 to February 15, 2015, with the price of KRW 341,00,000 (hereinafter “instant contract”). The provisions relating to the scope of construction in the instant contract relating thereto are as follows.

Article 4 (Contract Documents) 1) The Plaintiff is aware of the drawings and specifications of the construction and will act for the construction. Accordingly, the Plaintiff shall, as a matter of course, execute the construction for the purpose of this construction, even if omitted from the estimate, and shall not modify the amount.

3) The Plaintiff shall complete the construction work in accordance with the drawings and specifications approved by the Defendant. 4) If the content of the design is not clear, or there is an omission, error or inconsistency, this shall be immediately notified to the Defendant, and the Defendant shall be instructed by the Defendant.

5) Even if the construction is not specified in the minor alteration and drawing of the construction, the construction project shall be carried out by the Plaintiff within the scope of the contract amount. B. The Plaintiff shall perform the construction project within the scope of the contract amount. B. The Plaintiff’s freezing warehouse from February 10, 2015 under the instant contract (hereinafter “instant freezing warehouse”).

(c) On March 25, 2015, the Plaintiff installed freezing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul”) with a freezing machine.

B) The construction of replacing heat air to the freezing warehouse of this case (hereinafter referred to as “the heating and fishing construction of this case”).

B) A fire (hereinafter referred to as “instant fire”) was caused by a worker’s negligence during the course of melting work while performing construction work to replace the first floor heat control of the instant freezing storage from June 30, 2015 to July 2, 2015.

A. The underground floor was previously discharged. D.

The defendant is the construction cost of the contract of this case.