2. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the principle of directness, has a unique area for sentencing determination, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In the instant case, there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s judgment. In full view of the following: (a) the circumstance and circumstance of a drunk driving; (b) the degree of blood alcohol concentration; (c) the distance of a drunk driving; (d) the vehicle scrappings a vehicle; (b) the person who was subject to criminal punishment for a drunk driving on a total of six occasions including a suspended sentence; and (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of a repeated offense; and (d) all the conditions of the pleadings and the records of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s criminal record and the criminal records

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.