난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. In the course of the disposition, the following facts: (a) on October 15, 2016, the date of entry into the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (C-3) of the Republic of Korea on the date of applying for refugee status recognition on October 15, 2016 (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (b) on October 26, 2016, the date of applying for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (c) on March 2, 2018, the date of filing the application for objection that the Plaintiff’s non-recognition of refugee status could not be sufficiently based upon the grounds for recognition of refugee status: The fact that there is no ground for recognition of rejection with the decision of the court subject to notification on April 18, 2018; (c) evidence Nos. 1 through 4, B and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff's assertion is Ethiopia's misunderstanding of nationality.
Ethiopia, a minority ethnic group, ethiopia, lives together with the regime of Ethiopia, and in particular, advisers and illegal arrest have been made for party members B who engage in anti-government activities.
The plaintiff's punishment was arrested at the intelligence agency around December 2015 by engaging in activities against the government policy as party members B, and the plaintiff's friendship was also arrested by participating in the demonstration.
The Plaintiff joined the “C” organization of Ethiopia (hereinafter the organization of this case) as an organization of Ethiopia to find the right of Ethiopia after entering the Republic of Korea due to such discrimination and carbon pressure, and participated in Ethiopia Government Demonstration 4-5 times.
The instant disposition that did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful despite the possibility that the Plaintiff might be deprived of his return to Ethiopia due to the Plaintiff’s activities.
B. (1) In full view of the provisions of Article 2 Subparag. 1 and Article 18 of the Refugee Act, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees, the Minister of Justice is unable to obtain protection of the country of nationality or the protection of the country of nationality due to well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political comments.