beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고단2857

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 30, 2015, the Defendant is a person who leased and operated the window dressing point of “D” in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C and the first floor from E.

On November 2, 2015, the Defendant was subject to the control by the special judicial police officer F, etc., who belongs to the Korea Agricultural Products Quality Control Service Gyeonggi-do, on charges of violating the country of origin labeling of agricultural products, such as imported rice and kimchi, from the special judicial police officer F, etc. who belongs to the Korea Agricultural Products Quality Control Service. On November 2, 2015, the Defendant was willing to gather the name of G known through the ordinary insurance transaction, and

1. At around November 14:30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) requested F to prepare a written confirmation confirming the violation by F by the special judicial police officer F within the foregoing D branch office; (b) made F to substitute the suspect with the verification color pen instead of the suspect; and (c) made it as if he was G, with the verification color pen, the Defendant signed G in the name of G, stating “ Address: Gangseo-gu: H, name: G, and resident registration number I”.

In other words, the Defendant issued a false certificate to F by a special judicial police officer F, who is unaware of such forged fact, as above, as if it had been duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a certificate of G name on certification of fact, and submitted it to F.

2. The Defendant, at around 17:30 on November 16, 2015, when being examined as a suspect by a special judicial police officer from the second office of the Gyeonggi Agricultural Products Quality Control Service Gyeonggi-dong, the Defendant entered his name and resident registration number in the suspect interrogation protocol as if he was G, and signed the suspect interrogation protocol as “G” in the witness column of the suspect interrogation protocol and forged the above suspect interrogation protocol, and then, the Defendant forged the signature of “G” in the witness column of the suspect interrogation protocol and completed the same with the above F who was unaware of the forgery.