1. On September 11, 2017, the Defendant, on the victim B, posted a letter stating “4.9 pop-up pop-up of an external machine” on the Internet website Kafbook, and made a false statement stating that the Defendant would send KRW 600,000 to the victim B who visited the victim B by sending KRW 60,000.”

However, the defendant did not own the outer equipment, and even if he received the payment from the injured person, he did not have the intention or ability to send the outer equipment.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 600,000 won from the victim through the defendant's agricultural bank account under the name of the defendant's out-of-the-way payment.

2. On September 12, 2017, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that “Around September 12, 2017, the Defendant would send the CPU to a door-to-door, if he/she had contacted the victim to transfer KRW 125,000 to a third party.”

However, the defendant did not possess the CPU, and even if he received the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to send the CPU.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 125,000 won from the victim through the defendant's agricultural bank account as the CPU price.

3. On September 12, 2017, the Defendant, on the victim D, made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would send 600,000 won to her home page and her home page,” posted by the victim D on the Internet website “Sto High Republic of China” bulletin board, and that “The Defendant would send her home page and her home page her home page to transfer KRW 600,000 to her home page.”

However, the defendant is not holding a camera, and even if he receives the payment from the injured party.