2014년 제2회 경기도 부천시 지방공무원공개경쟁임용시험 불합격처분무효확인
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. Facts that there is no dispute over the details of the disposition (based on recognition), A1, 2, 4, 2, and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings;
A. On February 10, 2014, the Chairperson of the Gyeonggi-do Personnel Committee publicly announced the instant examination to publicly announce the Gyeonggi-do open competitive examination for local public officials on February 10, 2014, and the said public announcement clearly stated that the following subject examinations will be implemented:
(1) Subject examination: A unit of examination, the number of persons to be selected for each appointing agency is at least five persons. (2) At least 30 percent of the number of persons to be selected for each appointing agency in each stage of the examination (where the number of persons to be selected is at least five but less than ten persons, the minority number shall not apply if the number of persons to be selected for each stage of the examination is at least ten persons, and where the number of persons to be selected is at least ten persons, the minority number shall be rounded off). (3) If a person who has passed a certain gender falls short of the target ratio of appointment, he/she shall additionally pass an examination in excess
(D) The plaintiff applied for the examination of open competition for local public officials of Grade 9 (hereinafter referred to as the "examination of this case") among the examinations planned in the above public notice - 3 points. The above examination is an open competitive examination of appointment and the number of persons to be selected is at least five, and constitutes an examination subject to the target of gender equality appointment.
B. A failure disposition (1) On June 21, 2014, the Plaintiff applied for the written examination (1 and 2 concurrent examinations) of the instant case and passed the examination, and subsequently received the “ordinary” rating as a result of the interview.
(2) When the Defendant determined the successful candidates of the written examination in the instant case, the Defendant determined the successful candidates of the written examination as the successful candidates of the written examination, 11, more than 10 persons who are the initial successful candidates of the written examination.
Among them, two males including the plaintiff and nine females, and one male by applying the gender equality recruitment target system.