If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:40 on September 25, 2017, around 21:40, the victim C was unable to use a marina place under the influence of alcohol from the damaged person; and (b) was refused to use it, the Defendant damaged the victim-owned signboard at the entrance of the business place, which was installed at the entrance of the building at the speed of the steel-line hand (defluence) with approximately 1m of the market price of the fluing fluence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The victim’s property was damaged for the reason that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was minor.

The defendant has several criminal records of violence.

However, the defendant's mistake is recognized.

The degree of damage is not a serious part.

The punishment shall be determined as per the order by selecting a fine in consideration of the conditions of all the sentencing, such as the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, property status, etc.