All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (no. 10 months of imprisonment, No. 1759, No. 1759, No. 1759) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below against the defendant is too unfortunate and unfair.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The circumstances in which the defendant or prosecutor alleged for unfair reasons for sentencing have already been reflected in the sentencing grounds of the lower court. The circumstances in which the defendant or prosecutor alleged for unfair reasons for sentencing are likely to have already been reflected in the sentencing grounds of the lower court. The defendant committed each of the instant crimes for a considerable period of time again without being aware of, and without being aware of, the fact that some damaged goods were seized and returned to the victim, but there was no fact that the defendant actively took measures to recover damage, on the other hand, a person who does not want to have a special crime of intimidation that was in de facto marital relationship with the defendant, and the defendant was not subject to the punishment of the defendant, and there were no reasonable motive or motive to commit the crime in the process of sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant and prosecutor's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and thus, the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable.