Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On November 6, 2016, at around 00:20 on November 6, 2016, the Defendant, on the ground that the victim’s “D cafeteria” operated in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, had a sound to the effect that “the Defendant was not a guest with the will of her will, she would have her will, and her will to her will, her he/she was seated, she was her seated, and her will to her will be her, and the customer who had been seated, “I will be her will be her will be her head.”

“The above victims and customers interfere with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 15 minutes by having the customers leave the disturbance, i.e., “I have to take a photograph of this year, I have to take a photograph,” and thereby interfered with the victim’s restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mobile phone image data;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;