2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. On February 22, 2010, the Plaintiff was a person who, after undergoing the instant surgery at the Tol University Seoul Em University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) operated by the Defendant, cut down below the right trokes on the ground that he was subject to the instant surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

B. On October 21, 2009, the Plaintiff is a fluoral disease arising from the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor in the Defendant Hospital, which forms most part of the womb.

The type of Rose of Sharon is divided into three parts: the lag, the lag, the lag, and the nearest class according to the location occurring in the womb.

After receiving diagnosis, the instant surgery was performed, and the Defendant Hospital was performed on February 22, 2010.

C. On February 22, 2010, at around 10:45, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital administered 0.2 g of pentalum, a general anesthesia, to the Plaintiff. At around 10:50 on the same day, the Defendant Hospital: (a) fested in the engine in the process of estesting anesthesia or rapid continuous anesthesia inducement; (b) removed the 20m-g of an auxiliary drug at the time of general anesthesia to induce the pel-out completion during the surgery; (c) removed the end of the right-hand body of the womb in the first place after 11:15 on the same day; (d) 11:25 on the same day, it was intended to induce the Plaintiff to use the pentalum in the womb; (d) e.g., in the event that the main substance is to reduce the e., the e., e., e., g., the e., injection surgery; and (e) e., e., the e., the e. e., the e., injection surgery.

0.2m gresponding beer.