폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. Defendant A is a customer who has been placed in “B’s main store,” and the victim C is a business owner at the place.
On April 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 02:55 on April 10, 2016, the Defendant: (b) held the victim, who is the owner of the business, “the owner of the business, who ends the business without any customer; (c) started the business as the owner of the business; and (d) decided that the victim was the victim by suffering from a two-way main disease on the table.
Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.
2. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged of judgment: A judgment dismissing a public prosecution on June 9, 2016 that a written agreement stating that the victim of Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act does not want the punishment of the defendant is submitted (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).