2. The fact that the Defendant recognized a mistake and reflects the judgment, the Defendant was somewhat aged 67 years of age, and the economic situation is that the Defendant did not subscribe to the mandatory vehicle insurance due to the following reasons:

The fact that the statement is made is favorable to the defendant.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, and circumstances after committing the crime, the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, on the ground that the Defendant’s punishment is too excessive, and operated even though he was aware that the insurance period has lapsed in around 2014, and the period of coverage is not shorter than the period of coverage, the record of being punished for the same and similar crimes, the equity of the general punishment in the same and similar cases should be considered.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.